Tim's Atlanta Real Estate Blog: Tim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" (HomeAtlanta.com)

The New Crime in REO's: The Shocking Truth on Who's Behind It.

Unfortunately, I'm seeing more foreclosures being trashed by their former occupants.  Many times the appliances and light fixtures are being torn out.  I guess they try to sell them on Ebay or something. 

How much of the decrease in value for a foreclosure is due to this?

I thank God that I haven't been involved in one of the scenarios that is described below.

I really think there should be jail time for people who intentionally destroy property before they lose it to foreclosure. It's one thing if you don't have money to fix the roof but when you clog the drains or wreck the plumbing, that is just plain wrong and you should have to pay a price.

Via Jerry Bronstrup (Bristol Builders, Inc):

Scott was a husband and proud father of three. Nothing was more fulfilling than the day he was approved for a home loan. His dream of providing a home for his family was finally a reality. He would soon be a proud homeowner, inviting his friends and family over at every opportunity he could to show off his pride and joy. One day Scott's perfect world came crumbling down. Scott developed a destructive plan to counter his unforeseen fate. Who would have thought this law-abiding citizen would mastermind such a heinous crime…

The new crime in REO: Deliberate and catastrophic acts of vandalism bringing destruction and disaster throughout America. Who is committing these vindictive acts? You probably would be shocked to find out. They are the baseball coach, the schoolteacher, the doctor, the accountant, the computer tech, the neighbor who proudly displays the American flag on the front porch. They are homeowners who feel they are the victims of greedy and gluttonous banks preying on the dreams of the American family. They feel they have been “suckered”and deceived by the slick talking snake who magically found their dream home and negotiated a deal of a lifetime. They want their voice to be heard. They have been cleverly deceived only to find their dreams snatched away. They are leading a silent revolution against the system that destroyed their future by, in return, destroying the very thing that represents what was taken from them… their homes.

Yes, American homeowners are sabotaging their foreclosed homes with destructive acts of vandalism… the consequences of this could be far worse than imagined.

One of the most common acts of vandalism we are seeing involves water lines. A disgruntled occupant manipulates a water line to explode upon instant water pressure. Once the water is turned on, the house is flooded within hours. The cost to repair: thousands, and that’s just in repairing the obvious drywall and flooring damage.  There will also be health issues associated with mold growth. Run your HVAC system, then the mold spores could contaminate the entire house, unbeknownst to the innocent family buying the house, they get to breath the spores until they figure out why they are taking their children in for respiratory issues every 2 months. That my friends, leads us to an entirely different issue concerning agent disclosures, liabilities, etc. 

A worse scenario…. imagine an ill-tempered and impassioned occupant rigging a gas pipe to leak gas and when triggered by an “electrical defect” (also rigged) an explosive charge ignites the house. With the close proximity of homes to each other mixed with the dry landscape, we have recipe for disaster. One house fire could potentially endanger an entire city.

We have all seen the regurgitated debris coming from the foreclosure virus spread throughout our nation. It’s tangible, visible, stinks, and is pretty much a straightforward issue dealt with hard working clean out crews, dump trucks, lots of trash bags.

Unfortunately, the visible is not our worst enemy. The problems caused by the ploys and vindictive tactics of occupant vandalism are serious and could cause immediate health and safety issues. Realtors need to be educated on these tactics and deal with them head on.

Agents should rely on licensed contractors who are trained to properly inspect all service lines prior to turning on the main power switch and water valve. 

Those involved in the REO business, or any real estate for that matter, need to place high priority on the health and safety of community. The REO landscape has changed the world we live in. We can no longer avoid the giant purple elephant in the room.

TRUE STORY THAT HAPPENED TO US YESTERDAY:

We were called by an agent this week with a cry for help. He was checking on one of his REO's just in time to spot the beginnings of what would be a destructive flood caused by a manipulated water line, obviously sabotaged by the previous occupants. If we had not caught this in the time we did, we would be replacing dry wall and the flooring... for starters.

The agent actually blogged about it.. read it here.

 

 


 

5 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • November 23 2009 07:10AM

Have professional courtesy but don't cross the line.

As a real estate agent, I always remind myself who I'm working for.  I have to do what's best for my client.  If that means your client gets upset or loses money, so be it.  It's not my job to make sure both sides are happy with the deal.  It's my job to get the best deal for my client.

Broker Bryant says it better than I can so I'm just going to reblog his post.

Via Bryant Tutas-Tutas Towne Realty, Inc:

How professional is this?Hi folks. Let's talk a little bit about professional courtesy. I hear this term quite a bit on AR and in my business. Usually, it goes something like this:

  • "The listing agent should have told me he had other offers on the property, as a professional courtesy".
  • "Even though my buyer's offer was a low ball the listing broker should have gotten back to me before the offer expired, as a professional courtesy."

You get my point. Anyway, let me see if I can shed some light on this professional courtesy "thingie". First, I want to say, that anyone who has ever worked a deal with me will tell you that I am very professional in all that I do. I treat my peers with respect. I am always willing to help "newbies" in anyway I can and if I say I'm going to do something, I do it.

But, and it's a big but, sometimes what you are expecting me to do, as a "professional courtesy", is completely against what my customer/client is telling me to do or not do. Last time I checked, I work for my customer/clients NOT my peers.

My job, as a listing broker, is to look out for my Sellers and do everything I can to get their property sold in a reasonable amount of time and for a reasonable price. Sometimes, that may require my Seller and I to "sit on" your Buyer's offer. We may even choose to ignore it completely. We can do that. We may even use your offer to negotiate a better deal with another Buyer. We can do that too.

And you know what? I don't have to tell you I'm doing it. There is nothing unprofessional about that. Your Buyer is NOT my concern. What may seem like my lack of action or response, from your perspective, may very well be a negotiating strategy from my Seller's perspective. Don't jump to conclusions about my professionalism or lack of.

I completely agree that we should all work together and that we do not have to work in a disrespectful manner. We should be professionals in all we do. If you want to be a professional then please remember who you are working for and who is paying you. Your "professional courtesy" could very well jeopardize your customer/client's position. How professional is that? What say you?

Bryant Tutas
Broker/Owner
Tutas Towne Realty, Inc
Licensed Florida Real Estate Broker
http://CentralFloridaShortSales.com

http://ShortSaleSuperStars.com

Are you a Florida REALTOR(R) looking for a change? Check it out.

CENTRAL FLORIDA REALTOR(r) OPPORTUNITIES

Copyright © 2009 http://www.brokerbryant.com/ | All Rights Reserved

4 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • October 16 2009 08:31PM

Massachusetts Land Court Reaffirms Ruling Invalidating Titles To Thousands of Foreclosures

A judge's ruling in Massachusetts might invalidate thousand of foreclosures going back to 1989.

Long ruled that banks can't foreclose on homes unless they have complete paperwork covering every time a specific loan changed hands.

The judge found that fixing documents after the fact, as Wells Fargo and U.S. Bank did in the Springfield cases, isn't enough. He ruled that flaws not resolved earlier can depress bids at foreclosure auctions, reducing how much consumers who face home losses get for their places.

"The issues in this case are not merely . . . a matter of dotting i's and crossing t's. Instead, they lie at the heart of the protections given to homeowners and borrowers," Long wrote yesterday.

Experts say the ruling paves the way for thousands of people who've lost houses to foreclosure to challenge their homes' seizures

I enjoyed reading the complete ruling.  The banks were arguing that that's the way they've always been doing it so it shouldn't be a big deal. I was glad to see the judge stick to the law.

If they believe a change is warranted to reflect "industry standards and practice," they must seek that change from the legislature. I note, however, that if those "standards and practice" have brought us to the present situation (see, e.g., Chairman Ben Bernanke, Financial Innovation and Consumer Protection, speech at the Federal Reserve System's Sixth Biennial Community Affairs Research Conference (Apr. 17, 2009); R. Posner, A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of '08 and the Descent Into Depression (Harvard University Press 2009)), "we should learn something from that experience." Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214, 242 (1944)

A good read on the topic was posted by Karl Denninger.  Some interesting discussionon his Market Ticker Forum.  Denninger did a post last month explaining the problem in more detail

I'm not a lawyer so I thought before writing my own post, I would see if any resident expert on ActiveRain wrote about the topic.  I saw Richard Vetstein's post and thought it would be best to reblog it since he's actually an attorney who seems to be pretty knowledgeable.

Via Richard Vetstein (Vetstein Law Group, P.C.):

Originally posted on The Massachusetts Real Estate Law Blog

Today, Massachusetts Land Court Judge Keith Long reaffirmed his controversial ruling made back in March 2009 that invalidated foreclosure proceedings involving two Springfield homes because the lenders did not hold clear titles to the properties at the time of sale. A copy of the decision can be found here.

As I outlined in my prior post on this case, the problem the Land Court dealt with in this case is what happens when modern securitized mortgage lending practices meets outdated foreclosure laws. When mortgages are packaged to Wall Street investors, the ownership of a mortgage loan may be divided and freely transferred numerous times on the lenders’ books. But the mortgage loan documentation actually on file at the Registry of Deeds often lags far behind.

The Ruling

Judge Long ruled that foreclosures were invalid when the lender failed to bring  the ownership documentation (known as an assignment) up-to-date until after the foreclosure sale had already taken place. An assignment is a legal document confirming that a mortgage loan has been transferred from one lender to another. Assignments must be recorded with a registry of deeds so anyone researching a property’s title can track the loan’s origin and ownership. Oftentimes, as in the Ibanez case, lenders will sell bundles of loan and record backdated assignments with an effective date before the first foreclosure notice. Judge Long effectively prohibited this practice.

Despite the lender’s attempt to convince him otherwise, Judge Long came out (again) in favor of consumers:

The issues in this case are not merely problems with paperwork or a matter of dotting i’s and crossing t’s. Instead, they lie at the heart of the protections given to homeowners and borrowers by the Massachusetts legislature. To accept the plaintiffs’ arguments is to allow them to take someone’s home without any demonstrable right to do so, based upon the assumption that they ultimately will be able to show that they have that right and the further assumption that potential bidders will be undeterred by the lack of a demonstrable legal foundation for the sale and will nonetheless bid full value in the expectation that that foundation will ultimately be produced, even if it takes a year or more. The law recognizes the troubling nature of these assumptions, the harm caused if those assumptions prove erroneous, and commands otherwise.

Judge Long also had some choice words for lenders:

[T]he problem the [lenders] face (the present title defect) is entirely of their own making as a result of their failure to comply with the statute and the directives in their own securitization documents… What the plaintiffs truly seek is a change in the foreclosure sale statute (G.L. c. 244, § 14), which can only come from the legislature.

What Now?

That’s a good question and one not readily answerable. To be sure, the current state of flux and confusion surrounding foreclosure titles affected by an Ibanez issue will remain intact until an appellate court considers the case or some action by the Legislature (which may be unlikely). Given the importance of the decision, I predict that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court will take the unusual step of taking the case directly from the Land Court.

As for what happens in the year or so the case may be in appellate limbo, I asked an in house counsel for a leading title insurance company, and his response was essentially that it’s going to take a fair amount of time and research to figure this one out. If there’s an existing title insurance policy on the property, some but not all of the title companies may be willing to insure over the problem. If there’s no title policy in place, affected parties are going to have to ride this one out for awhile.

Once title insurance companies offer some further guidance, I will post it here.

 

 

2 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • October 15 2009 09:23PM

Is The FDIC Killing Short Sales?

This is a big story that needs to get out there.

It's all starting to add up and make some sense.  Unfortunately, it's the same old story.  Taxpayers are getting screwed and the well connected like George Soros and making billions.

Via Bob Hertzog (Summit Home Consultants):

Is The FDIC Killing Short Sales?

As some of you already know, I blogged recently about being interviewed recently by our local NBC news affiliate.  To read the blog, click here.  Basically, IndyMac Bank (now OneWest Bank), is holding one of my clients hostage, demanding a $75k promissory note, or they will proceed to foreclosure.  For the life of me, I couldn't figure out why they were doing this.  The BPO came in at the contract price of $275k, with a net to IndyMac of $241k.  What advantage could there possibly be for them to proceed to foreclosure?

Yesterday, I figured it out.  You see, IndyMac was taken over by the FDIC and sold to OneWest Bank in March/2009.  Guess who the investors are behind OneWest?  George Soros, Michael Dell, Steve Mnuchin (former Goldman Sachs executive), and John Paulson (hedge-fund billionaire).  

Now, listen to the deal they got from the FDIC....

Basically, they purchased all current residential mortgages at 70% of par value (70% of the outstanding loan amounts).  They purchased all current HELOCS at 58% of Par Value!!!

Next, in order to "sweeten the pot", the FDIC stepped in and guaranteed the following:  For any residential mortgages where OneWest experiences a loss, the FDIC will step in and cover anywhere from 80%-95% of the loss.  The loss is calculated using the ORIGINAL LOAN BALANCE, not the amount that OneWest paid for the loan.  Let's use my clients situation as an example:

Loan Amount is $478,000, plus 6 months of missed payments, for a grand total of $485,200

OneWest pays $334,600 for the loan

We have an all cash offer of $241,000, net to OneWest.

So, let's do the math, shall we?  The net loss, according to the FDIC formula is the ORIGINAL LOAN AMOUNT minus the amount of the offer.  In this case, $485,200-$241,000, or $244,200.  Next, the FDIC, according to their Loss Share Agreement, writes a check to OneWest for 80% of the so-called "net loss".  So, in this case, OneWest gets a check from Uncle Sam for $195,360 (.80 X $244,200).

Add the $195,360 to the sales price of $241,000, and you get a grand total of $436,360.  Remember, OneWest paid $334,600 for the loan.  So, OneWest puts $101,760 in their pocket, thanks to the FDIC.  Folks, that is over $100k of our hard-earned tax dollars!

So, you ask...Why does this program hurt short sales?  Because, our brilliant government offers this SAME PROGRAM FOR FORECLOSURES!  The only difference is, the government picks up 80% of the tab on all of the extra costs associated with a foreclosure (BPO's, upkeep, utilities/maintenance, legal fees, etc.)

So, If I'm OneWest, why would I want to waste my time negotiating through a Short Sale, when I can make the same amount of money (if not more) by just letting it go to foreclosure?  And we wonder why nobody can get a Loan Modification?  Why would OneWest approve a loan modification for this guy, when they can foreclose and make over $100k?  And, to add injury to insult, they have held this loan for 6 months!  Not a bad ROI, huh?

What infuriates me the most is that in my particular case mentioned above, they have the guts to hold my client hostage for a $75k promissory note, after they are already making more than $100k on the sale!!! This is his primary residence, 1st Position loan, and OneWest has NO RECOURSE!  Imagine if they could make $100k, then get a deficiency judgement!  Talk about making some big bucks!

Can you say "GREED"?

The scary thing is that over 50 banks have Shared Loss Agreements in place with the FDIC.  Some of them include:  Bank of America (go figure), CitiMortgage, Wells Fargo, etc.  

This entire agreement between the FDIC and OneWest can be found here, on the FDIC website.  It's all there, for the world to see!  They have it all layed out.  All of the formulas, worksheets, etc.  

Now, it's up to us to bring it to the attention of our elected officials and the media.  Enough is Enough!

UPDATE 9/18/09:  I JUST READ AN AWESOME ARTICLE ON THIS, THAT GOES INTO WAY MORE DETAIL THAN MY BLOG ABOVE.  TAKE THE TIME TO READ IT WHEN YOU GET A CHANCE! CLICK HERE TO READ IT.

Wait, it gets better...The FDIC just announced that it needs to start borrowing money from the U.S. Treasure in order to replenish it's deposit insurance fund (the same fund being used to pay all of these banks in the Loss Share Agreements).  Go Figure!  Click Here to read it.

 

summit logo

 

 

2 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • September 29 2009 09:01AM

Short Sale Strategies- Getting The Facts Straight - Case In Point

Can someone with good credit and good assets actually get a lender to do a short sale for them?

Katerina Gasset gives real life examples of situtations where banks are accepting short sales for people who's "hardship" might not be exactly what one would define as a hardship. 

The bottom line is, everything is negotiable and you never know what a bank will be willing to do until you approach them with a proposition.

Via Nestor & Katerina Gasset Realtors® Wellington Florida Luxury Homes (International Properties and Investments, Inc.):

Short Sale Strategies- Getting The Facts Straight For Sellers With Money- Case In Point

Let me set the record straight with who can get a short sale approved and who can not.

The main answer to the question is that is all depends on the lender and their policies regarding approving short sales.

Most lenders would rather have a short sale approved then foreclose on yet another property even if there is no financial hardship.
There are some lenders who will only approve short sales for financial hardships and others who will approve short sales if the terms are right for just about anybody.
Before taking on short sales you need to find out the policies of each of the short sale lenders that you will come into contact with.


It is simply NOT true when agents tell you that your clients without financial hardships can not do a short sale. In fact, just the mere fact that an agent is making a judgment call like that without knowing or trying is doing a disservice to a seller. It depends on how hard you want to fight for your sellers.

There are a lot of blogs out there where agents who say they know how to do short sales are not stating the facts correctly.

Just because your seller does not have a financial hardship does not mean they will not get approved for a short sale.

First let's get clear on what a short sale is since even after the last several years of short sales being prominent here in Florida, many states are just now beginning to experience short sales in their respective markets. A short sale is when a seller's property is worth less and will only sell for less than what the seller owes to his lender. So the seller is going to have to ask his lender to accept less than a full pay off of what he borrowed from his lender. It is up to his lender to say yes or no or yes with conditions.

A short sale is a short pay off of a loan, nothing more, nothing less. There are many terms and conditions that can be attached to a short pay off.

So now that we all understand what a short sale actually is we can look at some different possible outcomes for a wealthy seller, an investor or a non financial hardship case. There are also many cases where the seller may appear not to have any hardship but after you ask some probing questions you may discover hardships that the seller may not think of. I will write a short sale strategy post on this process.

One other thing I want to get really straight right now is that we do list and sell short sale listings and we have clients from all different financial backgrounds and situations. So the cases I will expand upon are real but I can not disclose the names to protect the identity of clients' financials. I want to make it very clear that these are true cases. I am not making this stuff up. I am not teaching out of some real estate book. I am not out in left field. I am in my own back yard, my own field of short sales. So if you want to listen to agents who don't do short sales but tell you how to do them, that is your decision. We are in the trenches. We carry a lot of listings and we close a lot of short sales.

When you first do your intake evaluation with a potential short sale client you must make certain things very clear and you must assess the client's situation. Financial hardships are relative and you can create a good case if you know the right questions to ask.

When we have clients who have money in their bank accounts or who own several to many other properties we will not take their short sale listing unless they agree to participate in the terms of the short sale. The usual way that a short sale lender treats a short sale is that the more financially strong the homeowner is, the more the lender is going to want them to contribute with a cash contribution towards the short fall and/or a promissory note.

We have closed on short sales where there is not a financial hardship for the homeowner but that something else changed in their lives. We just closed one that Broker Bryant referred to us where the sellers have great credit, they own and live in a home in another state and they no longer wanted their rental here.

They had tenants in the rental who were paying the mortgage. Their lender turned down our first short sale offer because the sellers were current on their mortgage on the rental which is the property they wanted to do the short sale on. So then they stopped paying their mortgage.

We received another offer.  You should have seen the bank statements and what they used their money for.  They were also paying off their credit card debt. They kept the rental money too. The first lien holder let them off free and clear through our negotiations with them. The second lien holder asked for a $30,000 promissory note which we negotiated down to $13,000 with payment of $110 per month and ZERO interest. This was a great offer for these sellers and they understood going into this deal that they would be required to participate in some way.

It was not our job to judge their motives or whether they were 'worthy' of a short sale approval or not. Our job was to negotiate the best possible outcome for them based on their own set of circumstances.

We never take their initial offer as fact. Everything is negotiable.

Nearly every situation where there is not a hardship case the seller is going to be adding cash or signing a note. If the sellers do not want to take part in that then we don't take the listing. There are many ways around this situation which we won't go into now- suffice it to say- you got to pay if you want to play.

On our financial hardship cases, we always get our sellers off without any payment plan or cash contributions even when there is PMI involved, which I will post on later- how to deal with PMI companies.


We have another listing where the seller owes over 2.6 Million dollars ( not disclosing exact #s). We just got approval on the short sale to close in the $600,000's. The buyer is going to pay all cash. The lender wants a $25,000 cash contribution. The buyer and seller are going to pay that contribution to the short sale lender.

Case in point- Seller has over 1 million dollars in his bank account and has some joint accounts. He was going to pay to play then changed his mind. We have been through several buyers because the lender wants a cash contribution from the seller of $50,000 but the seller does not want to take that out of his bank account. He owns several other properties and is not late on any mortgage payment except this one. This is not sitting too well with his lender. They feel he is getting off too easy. We negotiate back, saying, what does it matter, still better than a foreclosure.  Now we finally found a buyer who is going to contribute a large hunk of this and the seller now will finally contribute to make the short sale happen. We will get this closed.

Case in point- Seller owns many properties around the country. They want to short sale their rental here in Florida. They make very good money. We will only accept their short sale listing if they agree to contribute to the short sale financially.  We know their lender and they will be able to do the short sale. The seller agrees to participate financially if that is a condition. Knowing this lender- they most likely will require a contribution. The seller understands this and will participate. Investors can get short sales approved. We have one investor where we have listed and sold 4 of his properties  so far as short sales and all were approved. By the way, all of his were Countrywide loans.


Case in point- Doctors and attorneys. We list and negotiate short sales for attorneys' personal and investment properties. We have already listed and closed short sales for 2 attorneys and are in negotiations on short sales for 3 other attorneys right now.  The attorneys look great on credit and paper. It is all about selling their story. They all understand that based on their occupations alone they are going to be scrutinized and expected to play ball with cash to close or promissory notes.  Many attorneys have taken a hit in income depending on what their specialty is. So although they may be able to pay a mortgage payment of $3500 a month; they no longer can make payments of $7,500 a month. If the lenders are not going to approve their loan modification which has been the case for each of our attorney clients their best option may be to try to get a short sale approved, cut their losses and move on with their lives and businesses.

The biggest obstacle is getting your short sale file to the upper management in these cases because employees at these servicers are looking at the occupation of 'attorney' or 'doctor' and instantly judge them to be some rich people who are much better off than they are. Diligence is key here.

Hopefully this clears up some misconceptions as to who may get approved for a short sale. Please remember this is based on Florida stats, Florida laws and the way the lenders treat properties in Florida which is going to be much different than in Arizona or other trust deed states. The only constant is that rules and policies change in regards to short sales often.

For more information about Florida Short Sales- click here.

        

 

Search For Wellington Florida homes for sale

 

To  view Florida Short Sales- Click here. We know Palm Beach County Short Sales and Port St Lucie Florida Short Sales and will help you get your home Sold if you need to Sell your home and help you buy your home in Palm Beach County Florida : Call us today.

 

By TwitterButton

Short Sale Strategies- Getting The Facts Straight- Case In Point! -was first published on South- Florida-Luxury-Living.com.

Copyright © 2009 By Katerina Gasset, All Rights Reserved.*Short Sale Strategies- Getting The Facts Straight- Case In Point!.

0 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • September 28 2009 08:28PM

How Will Cap and Trade Effect Your Real Estate Business?

Katerina Gasset did a great post on the effect we will see if Cap and Trade is passed.  Sure, everyone wants to save the planet and save energy but let's think this through and realize how it will change your everyday life. 

Katerina touches on some the the real estate related provisions. 

I'm just reblogging her post because it pretty much sums up what I have discovered in my limited research on the topic.

Via Nestor & Katerina Gasset Realtors® Wellington Florida Luxury Homes (International Properties and Investments, Inc.):

Real estate is local when it comes to market conditions and market trends. Real estate differs from region to region in styles, architecture and amenities generally speaking. For instance; in Florida fireplaces are not the norm whereas in cold winter areas such as Colorado, fireplaces are a standard addition to a home. In some areas of our country people have wood burning stoves and others have coal burning furnaces. There are areas of our country such as here in Florida where you would not dare live without Air Conditioning but in many homes in Washington for instance, air conditioning is more of a luxury than a necessity.

So when we are discussing the effects of cap and trade in your real estate business you will need to take into account the region in which you live as some areas will be more effected than others. 

Here is a really good interactive map from the New York Times. The map I posted below is the map of the votes in the House for and against the Cap and Tax bill that just passed the House. But if you click on the link of the New York Times map, it is interactive.

cap and trade house vote new york times

 

You can move your mouse over the map and see who voted, what party they belong to and their district. You will be able to see that no matter whether they were democrats or republicans if they are in the farm country of America, high manufacturing areas of America, low energy bills of America and the heartland of America- they voted NO on this bill and for very good reasons. 

"For a household of four, energy costs go up $436 that year, and they eventually reach $1,241 in 2035 and average $829 annually over that span. Electricity costs go up 90 percent by 2035, gasoline by 58 percent, and natural gas by 55 percent by 2035. The cumulative higher energy costs for a family of four by then will be nearly $20,000.

But direct energy costs are only part of the consumer impact. Nearly everything goes up, since higher energy costs raise production costs. If you look at the total cost of Waxman-Markey, it works out to an average of $2,979 annually from 2012-2035 for a household of four. By 2035 alone, the total cost is over $4,600." Heritage Foundation.

You will notice that the states where the votes were yes are also the states that already have the highest energy bills. The states that voted no are mostly states with presently low energy bills.

Instead of calling this to Cap and Trade- We can really call it the Tax On Electricity Bill.

How does this information pertain to real estate agents? If you live in the lower energy pricing states you are going to be seeing huge increases in household energy bills. If you live in states that are coal powered or oil powered you will see the largest increases ever in your energy bills because those energy sources are going to be punished with taxation.

  • How is that going to effect home prices?
  • How is that going to effect movement in and out of your state?
  • How is that going to effect your real estate office utility bills and who is going to pay for this?

The House is at it again. This was a 1,300 page bill and again as with so many large bills was not read by most of those that voted yes or no. What is it that they don't get? The American people expect our leaders to read what they vote on.

So what else is tucked away neatly into this bill that perhaps no one knows the full implications of yet?

How about the Federal imposition and takeover of building codes? Your local planning and building offices will not be qualified for any Federal funding of any kind unless they adopt what the FEDS say is the new energy efficient building standards. This will create higher prices in building new homes which is then passed on the homebuyers and then you as a real estate agent are also effected because less buyers will be able to afford to buy a new home built . Not to mention having to wait for the Feds to come and inspect the builders and the homes.

How about the new Federal Energy Nazis Inspectors who will come and rate your home before you can sell your home. So before you can list a home for sale, the seller will have to wait for the Federal inspectors to come out. DMV lines anyone? Once that inspector comes out, he or she will give the home an energy rating. If the home does not meet the guidelines the seller will be required to do the work necessary to bring the home up to energy standards before they can sell the home! Can we say money? Does that mean that there will be homeowners who will become prisoners in their homes because they can not afford to make the energy repairs that the feds require? Is that an invasion of your privacy as well as an attack on your property rights?

Hmmm, how is that going to effect short sales where the seller has no money to make the repairs and adjustments?

  • How is that going to effect your ability to get listings in a timely manner?
  • How is that going to effect your seller who is about to lose their home in a foreclosure?
  • How is that going to effect the seller who has to relocate for their job?
  • How is that going to effect the estates with heirs having to do these repairs and such when there won't be any money until the estate is sold?

I wonder if our House of Representatives and our Congress men and women EVER thought to actually ask us in the field working this business day in and day out how these bills will effect the housing market?

Of course, the US will be living Cap and Tax while the real perpetrators of dirty air like China and India get off scott free. There will be an unfair advantage in pricing products and manufacturing to the point that if a US company even stands a chance of staying in the manufacturing business will have no choice but to move their company oversees which in turn will cause a massive layoff of people increasing the already high unemployment problem we are facing in our country.

  • How will the unemployment effect your real estate business?
  • How will the unemployment effect the REOs and massive foreclosures in your community?
  • How will the unemployment effect home values as you get more and more vacant properties in your area?

If you are an agent in America's farmland you will begin to see farms no longer being able to produce a profit. Farms use a lot of energy. Energy use will be punished. This is why nearly every politician from a farm land state no matter what party they are affiliated with voted no to this bill. Their districts will suffer terribly. As this happens we will be buying more and more produce from other countries with far less health standards than our own. I don't trust foods, especially produce from China or other countries except Europe. But we don't import our veggies from Europe! 

  • How is this going to effect your real esate business if you live and work in a farm land state?

When it comes down to the nitty and the gritty about this bill you must remember that GE is the biggest supporter of this bill. They stand to make billions of dollars from the passage of this bill. The politicians voting yes on this bill, many of them are getting paid to vote yes. And Al Gore will become the very first GREEN billionaire. It is just too bad that he is not a real capitalist. He could not become a billionaire playing fair and square. Instead, he has an unfair advantage, legislation to make him filthy rich. Not exactly the free market way. It is all about the money.

Contact your Senators now to vote NO now. Click on this link to find your Senators and contact them by email, phone and fax today. Let them know how this is going to effect your business and your community homeowners and buyers. Pass this on...

 

2 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • July 01 2009 07:31AM

Honduras Respects the Rule of Law. Is Drug Money the Cause for US Condemnation?

The recent events in Honduras made me do a little research on what is actually going on down there.  There's something very strange going on when Hugo Chaves, Fidel Castro, the UN and the US all are coming down against what they are calling a "military coup".  If you just read the headlines and listen to Obama, you would think that it's the same old military takeover going on in a banana republic.

Here is a good news report that gives more details than the standard talking points I've been hearing from Obama and others.

From what I have pieced together, it's almost the complete opposite.  The only reason the military is involved is because the President of Honduras refused to listen to the Honduras Congress and the Supreme Court. 

Honduras has a constitution which allows elections every four years with a one term limit for the President.  Their next election is scheduled for November of this year. Apparently, current President Zelaya doesn't like the term limit and wants to change it so he can be president again. 

There's a Constitutional process in place to change the Constitution.  Congress must authorize a referendum that would let the people vote on whether they wanted to have a Constitutional Convention to change it.  Apparently the freely elected Congress of Honduras voted down the referendum.  Not liking that, Zelaya did what many authoritative dictators would do, he tried to get the military to do what he couldn't lawfully do through the Congress.  He had the military draw up ballots and was going to hold his own referendum on changing the Constitution. 

The Congress followed the law and took the matter to the Supreme Court of Honduras.   The Supreme Court followed the Constitution and ruled that Zelaya had no authority to override Congress and run his own referendum to change the Constitution.

The Supreme Court ordered the military to seize the unauthorized referendum ballots which the military did like any good law abiding military would do.

Zelaya then had his thugs try to take the ballots from the military bases and distribute them himself.  What do you do when your President doesn't follow the rule of law and obey a Supreme Court ruling?  You do what the rule of law compels you to do and you remove the President from office and replace him with someone following the rules set up in the Constitution. 

Roberto Micheletti is now the temporary President of Honduras until the regularly scheduled elections are held in November. 

I applaud the Honduras people for following their Constitution and the rule of law. 

I have wondered why Obama and the UN are trying to spin this as a lawless military coup. Do they just see things differently than I do or is there something else that is tainting their views?

I really think it comes down to money, drug money that is.  Here's an AP story talking about how the drug cartels use Honduras to gets drugs into the US.

I hate to sound like a tin foil hat conspiracy nut but like they say, follow the money. Many "tin foil hat" people have written extensively about how drug money is tied into many things  happening in the world.  I usually discount much of it but always keep an open mind waiting for other confirming pieces of evidence.  This just might be a piece of the puzzle that can explain some very bizarre behavior. 

Let's watch how things develop.  Beware of simple sound bites and let's try to understand what's really going on  in Honduras.

5 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • July 01 2009 07:12AM

I Agree with the Congressman, Cap and Trade is a "Pile of Shit"

I didn't know much about the big Cap and Trade bill that the House just passed on Friday.  I'm sure most of the Congressmen didn't take the time to read the 1200 pages.  A 300 page amendment got added at 3am Friday morning, hours before the vote.

This sounds so much like the $787 billion TARP package that was passed so quickly last fall.  It just makes me sick that such a huge bill that will affect taxpayers for generations gets passed with so little time to actually know what's in the bill.

This bill is going to affect real estate big time.  It sounds like there will now be a national building code.  It sounds like there will be required energy audits needed before you can sell your home.  Every time you remodel your home there will have to be a before and after energy audit.  Appraisers will have to be recertified in how to take energy improvements into account when appraising a home.

Maybe some of that stuff might be good but to me it seems like a ton of new red tape and beauracracy.  The Federal Government will taking more control over every aspect of our lives.

Representive Boehner was quoted as saying that this bill was a pile of shit.  After watching him read through this bill, I have to agree with him. I say that the Congressmen who voted for this pile of shit should shove every page of it up their ass to cap the foul emissions they're producing.

I challenge you to watch Congressman Boehner go through this 300 page amendment.  Then go and read the bill and see if you can figure it out yourself.  This is an historic bill and I think we need to understand what the effects will be before it is voted on by the Senate.

What's the rush?  The last I read was that the last ten years temperatures have been on their way down.  Now some are worried about Global Cooling.  I just think that it's a rush for a big power grab and money grab.  This thing is so big and complex that nobody will really know what's going on and how much it is costing everyone.  I have a feeling that is the ultimate purpose here.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3  This is where he covers some of the real estate parts of the bill.

 

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Part 7

 

6 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • June 29 2009 08:04AM

Unbelievable Basketball Shot. Full Court Doing a Full Flip!

I thought I saw everything.  Here's a middle school kid making a full court shot.  That's pretty darn difficult by itself.  But he took it to a whole other level.  He did a full forward flip as he was shooting the ball.

I wonder how he even thought of doing such a thing.

8 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • June 23 2009 07:06AM

When Are We Going to Get a Real Estate Czar?

I saw an article about the soon to be announced "pay czar".

It made me laugh.  It seems like they have a czar for just about everything now.  I did a little research and found that Obama now has 16 czars working for him.  This is way more than any past administration.

  • Drug Czar

Gil Kerlikowske, former Seattle police chief

  • Energy and Environment Czar

Carol Browner

  • Homeland Security Czar

John Brennan

  • Health Czar

Nancy-Ann DeParle

  • Urban Affairs Czar

Adolfo Carrion, Jr.

  • Economic Czar

Paul A. Volcker

  • Regulatory Czar

Cass R. Sunstein

  • Technology Czar

Vivek Kundra

  • Government Performance Czar

Jeffrey Zients

  • Border Czar

Alan Bersin

  • WMD Policy Czar

Gary Samore

  • Intelligence Czar (Director of National Intelligence)

Dennis Blair

  • Car Czar

Steven Rattner

  • Pay Czar

Kenneth R. Feinberg

  • Great Lakes Czar

Cameron Davis

  • Cyber Czar

TBA

Something just doesn't seem right about this.  Is this really the way the system is supposed to be set up or are we slowly changing the checks and balances set up by the Constitution?

I guess a czar can cut through the bureaucracy and make things happen faster but that's only good if you can really trust the people in power.  Many might trust Obama with this power but does this lay the groundwork for a power grab by a future president who might not be as trustworthy?  I just don't like it.

5 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • June 10 2009 11:29AM

How's the Economic Recovery Plan Working?

On January 10th 2009, the Obama team came out with their economic recovery plan that they were going to immediately get implemented.  They put out a really nice report with a lot of big numbers.  These are the best and brightest people working on the economic plan. 

They had one nice chart showing the projected unemployment rate with and without their plan.  Innocentbystander.net took the Obama team's graphed projections and plotted out the real unemployment numbers that actually took place over the last five months after the Obama plan was passed.

The "Without Recovery Plan" line is looking pretty good right now.  How long do we go before we change course?  Do we double down and increase spending even more? How could these guys be off by so much?  Was there some big unknown that wasn't taken into account?  Can we really have confidence that these guys really know what they are doing?

 

 

 

9 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • June 09 2009 09:21PM

About a Third of Atlanta Foreclosures Selling at or Above List Price

I'm seeing a lot of foreclosures being priced very aggressively.  It's creating multiple offer situations.  I am working with a buyer right now who has been beat out of a foreclosure deal by someone else four times over the past few months.

He tells me that if it's a "buyer's market" why should he have to pay any where near asking price.  It has been very frustrating.  I began wondering if it was just bad luck on  my part that just about every "great deal" that I find for my buyers is getting competing offers.

So I did a small analysis. I searched for single family detached foreclosures that have sold in the past 30 days that are in the northern half of Atlanta above $100,000.  What I found was that the 325 sales had a average sales/list price ratio of 92%.  Also, 106 of those 325 sales sold for the list price or above. So about 1 out of 3 foreclosures are getting full price. 

Sometimes looking at the raw data gives people a better feel for what's going on.  So here is the data for those foreclosure sales just so you can see for your own eyes what's actually going on.  

List Price Sale Price Activity Date Sales price - list price
$1,089,900 $900,000 5/19/2009 ($189,900)
$805,000 $690,000 5/19/2009 ($115,000)
$799,900 $730,000 5/13/2009 ($69,900)
$769,900 $659,000 5/11/2009 ($110,900)
$550,000 $510,000 6/3/2009 ($40,000)
$475,900 $477,900 5/19/2009 $2,000
$346,000 $325,000 5/26/2009 ($21,000)
$288,900 $275,900 5/8/2009 ($13,000)
$248,900 $242,000 5/26/2009 ($6,900)
$204,900 $190,000 5/29/2009 ($14,900)
$149,900 $146,650 6/2/2009 ($3,250)
$139,900 $94,900 5/18/2009 ($45,000)
$139,900 $146,000 5/19/2009 $6,100
$599,900 $595,000 6/3/2009 ($4,900)
$475,000 $480,000 5/18/2009 $5,000
$429,000 $425,000 5/11/2009 ($4,000)
$400,000 $391,000 5/6/2009 ($9,000)
$305,000 $350,000 5/14/2009 $45,000
$279,900 $276,200 5/7/2009 ($3,700)
$249,900 $225,000 5/14/2009 ($24,900)
$219,900 $215,000 5/21/2009 ($4,900)
$209,900 $216,900 5/18/2009 $7,000
$186,300 $180,000 5/8/2009 ($6,300)
$181,900 $173,800 5/29/2009 ($8,100)
$179,900 $174,900 5/27/2009 ($5,000)
$175,900 $175,000 5/21/2009 ($900)
$129,900 $130,000 5/6/2009 $100
$110,000 $110,000 5/8/2009 $0
$1,299,000 $1,099,000 5/18/2009 ($200,000)
$939,000 $851,000 5/12/2009 ($88,000)
$891,900 $768,000 5/28/2009 ($123,900)
$249,900 $230,900 5/27/2009 ($19,000)
$899,900 $750,000 5/27/2009 ($149,900)
$309,900 $284,500 5/20/2009 ($25,400)
$209,900 $212,000 6/3/2009 $2,100
$199,900 $226,000 5/6/2009 $26,100
$188,155 $186,000 5/29/2009 ($2,155)
$142,500 $143,900 5/21/2009 $1,400
$139,999 $142,250 5/18/2009 $2,251
$129,500 $123,500 5/18/2009 ($6,000)
$280,900 $260,000 5/27/2009 ($20,900)
$259,900 $245,000 6/1/2009 ($14,900)
$239,000 $210,000 5/18/2009 ($29,000)
$121,900 $105,000 5/7/2009 ($16,900)
$689,900 $639,999 5/21/2009 ($49,901)
$640,000 $515,000 5/8/2009 ($125,000)
$552,900 $533,000 5/7/2009 ($19,900)
$445,500 $426,125 5/20/2009 ($19,375)
$215,000 $207,000 5/15/2009 ($8,000)
$130,000 $130,000 5/27/2009 $0
$275,000 $260,000 5/21/2009 ($15,000)
$212,000 $200,000 5/12/2009 ($12,000)
$199,900 $175,000 5/20/2009 ($24,900)
$184,900 $187,000 6/4/2009 $2,100
$543,900 $512,005 5/20/2009 ($31,895)
$104,000 $104,000 5/6/2009 $0
$1,499,000 $1,274,150 5/18/2009 ($224,850)
$979,900 $859,000 5/7/2009 ($120,900)
$789,000 $700,500 5/29/2009 ($88,500)
$709,900 $650,000 5/22/2009 ($59,900)
$699,000 $659,000 5/14/2009 ($40,000)
$649,900 $629,900 5/29/2009 ($20,000)
$459,900 $459,900 5/21/2009 $0
$449,900 $449,900 5/18/2009 $0
$439,900 $390,000 5/12/2009 ($49,900)
$389,900 $362,450 5/19/2009 ($27,450)
$364,900 $355,000 5/19/2009 ($9,900)
$319,000 $329,000 5/21/2009 $10,000
$274,900 $270,000 5/7/2009 ($4,900)
$249,900 $218,000 5/20/2009 ($31,900)
$213,500 $211,000 5/6/2009 ($2,500)
$205,000 $205,000 5/14/2009 $0
$189,900 $152,250 5/20/2009 ($37,650)
$189,900 $183,200 5/6/2009 ($6,700)
$189,900 $180,000 5/18/2009 ($9,900)
$184,900 $184,900 5/6/2009 $0
$179,900 $179,000 5/27/2009 ($900)
$179,900 $179,900 6/3/2009 $0
$175,000 $173,000 6/3/2009 ($2,000)
$169,900 $165,000 5/6/2009 ($4,900)
$162,000 $148,000 5/6/2009 ($14,000)
$159,900 $165,000 5/11/2009 $5,100
$159,650 $164,300 5/8/2009 $4,650
$154,900 $169,900 5/22/2009 $15,000
$153,000 $153,000 5/20/2009 $0
$150,000 $151,000 5/28/2009 $1,000
$145,900 $150,500 5/22/2009 $4,600
$139,900 $132,500 5/13/2009 ($7,400)
$139,900 $145,000 5/18/2009 $5,100
$132,900 $132,900 5/14/2009 $0
$131,900 $130,900 6/3/2009 ($1,000)
$127,591 $127,591 5/27/2009 $0
$122,000 $121,400 5/18/2009 ($600)
$117,300 $105,000 5/11/2009 ($12,300)
$115,000 $106,000 5/8/2009 ($9,000)
$114,900 $116,600 5/7/2009 $1,700
$113,900 $117,500 5/26/2009 $3,600
$106,900 $106,900 5/20/2009 $0
$422,900 $407,500 5/15/2009 ($15,400)
$399,900 $400,000 6/3/2009 $100
$389,000 $370,000 6/4/2009 ($19,000)
$385,000 $370,000 5/8/2009 ($15,000)
$324,900 $320,000 6/1/2009 ($4,900)
$289,000 $192,700 5/29/2009 ($96,300)
$287,500 $239,000 5/15/2009 ($48,500)
$274,500 $229,750 5/18/2009 ($44,750)
$245,000 $215,340 5/11/2009 ($29,660)
$239,900 $230,000 5/11/2009 ($9,900)
$213,900 $217,000 5/20/2009 $3,100
$199,900 $197,000 6/1/2009 ($2,900)
$189,900 $192,000 5/29/2009 $2,100
$187,900 $187,900 5/6/2009 $0
$184,900 $173,000 5/29/2009 ($11,900)
$184,500 $184,500 5/6/2009 $0
$179,900 $155,000 5/12/2009 ($24,900)
$179,900 $145,000 6/4/2009 ($34,900)
$177,000 $177,000 5/26/2009 $0
$161,500 $154,000 5/19/2009 ($7,500)
$159,900 $165,795 5/6/2009 $5,895
$159,900 $151,000 5/29/2009 ($8,900)
$156,800 $156,800 5/14/2009 $0
$155,000 $147,500 5/13/2009 ($7,500)
$154,900 $160,500 5/8/2009 $5,600
$152,900 $153,000 5/12/2009 $100
$149,900 $149,900 5/6/2009 $0
$139,999 $130,000 6/3/2009 ($9,999)
$129,900 $129,900 5/26/2009 $0
$123,500 $125,000 5/29/2009 $1,500
$123,200 $126,200 5/14/2009 $3,000
$119,900 $117,500 5/13/2009 ($2,400)
$119,900 $124,500 5/13/2009 $4,600
$119,000 $118,000 5/7/2009 ($1,000)
$114,900 $127,000 5/18/2009 $12,100
$114,500 $103,000 5/7/2009 ($11,500)
$109,900 $109,900 5/20/2009 $0
$109,900 $105,000 5/13/2009 ($4,900)
$102,900 $95,500 5/19/2009 ($7,400)
$102,500 $105,000 5/19/2009 $2,500
$101,600 $92,400 5/19/2009 ($9,200)
$300,000 $321,000 5/7/2009 $21,000
$261,300 $259,350 5/22/2009 ($1,950)
$214,900 $206,000 6/3/2009 ($8,900)
$204,900 $190,000 5/13/2009 ($14,900)
$203,000 $197,500 6/3/2009 ($5,500)
$193,900 $177,000 5/6/2009 ($16,900)
$189,900 $200,000 5/15/2009 $10,100
$184,900 $175,000 5/15/2009 ($9,900)
$174,900 $178,125 5/28/2009 $3,225
$160,000 $156,500 5/19/2009 ($3,500)
$149,999 $153,000 5/6/2009 $3,001
$144,000 $136,800 5/29/2009 ($7,200)
$140,087 $138,000 5/11/2009 ($2,087)
$140,000 $140,000 5/11/2009 $0
$134,900 $140,900 5/12/2009 $6,000
$121,900 $137,000 5/13/2009 $15,100
$120,900 $124,500 5/14/2009 $3,600
$118,000 $121,000 5/18/2009 $3,000
$109,900 $95,000 5/14/2009 ($14,900)
$109,300 $104,900 5/14/2009 ($4,400)
$105,000 $105,000 5/7/2009 $0
$104,900 $98,925 5/11/2009 ($5,975)
$209,900 $218,511 5/21/2009 $8,611
$159,900 $160,000 6/3/2009 $100
$149,200 $140,000 5/26/2009 ($9,200)
$141,312 $115,500 5/7/2009 ($25,812)
$134,900 $110,000 5/19/2009 ($24,900)
$132,900 $115,700 5/29/2009 ($17,200)
$130,500 $130,500 5/13/2009 $0
$123,900 $119,000 5/14/2009 ($4,900)
$119,900 $119,000 5/11/2009 ($900)
$119,900 $109,000 5/26/2009 ($10,900)
$109,900 $112,000 5/8/2009 $2,100
$104,900 $119,900 5/29/2009 $15,000
$469,900 $467,285 6/3/2009 ($2,615)
$449,900 $435,000 6/2/2009 ($14,900)
$325,000 $275,000 5/26/2009 ($50,000)
$299,900 $298,000 5/6/2009 ($1,900)
$275,000 $270,000 5/20/2009 ($5,000)
$239,900 $238,900 5/13/2009 ($1,000)
$235,000 $226,250 5/14/2009 ($8,750)
$224,900 $195,000 5/22/2009 ($29,900)
$154,500 $150,000 5/11/2009 ($4,500)
$139,900 $93,500 5/12/2009 ($46,400)
$135,000 $130,000 5/14/2009 ($5,000)
$119,900 $116,600 5/18/2009 ($3,300)
$114,900 $112,000 5/14/2009 ($2,900)
$109,900 $116,000 5/26/2009 $6,100
$109,600 $102,500 5/29/2009 ($7,100)
$109,250 $105,000 5/29/2009 ($4,250)
$106,900 $80,000 5/29/2009 ($26,900)
$102,900 $102,000 5/15/2009 ($900)
$535,900 $425,000 5/29/2009 ($110,900)
$529,900 $497,500 5/18/2009 ($32,400)
$521,500 $475,290 5/20/2009 ($46,210)
$465,000 $420,000 5/7/2009 ($45,000)
$449,000 $420,000 5/27/2009 ($29,000)
$429,900 $419,000 5/7/2009 ($10,900)
$427,900 $400,000 5/26/2009 ($27,900)
$309,985 $309,985 5/27/2009 $0
$259,900 $260,000 5/11/2009 $100
$241,900 $241,900 6/2/2009 $0
$235,000 $240,000 5/12/2009 $5,000
$224,900 $224,000 5/28/2009 ($900)
$217,400 $236,000 5/18/2009 $18,600
$193,900 $196,000 5/6/2009 $2,100
$179,900 $160,000 5/6/2009 ($19,900)
$176,300 $183,000 5/20/2009 $6,700
$170,900 $170,900 5/13/2009 $0
$169,900 $152,500 5/20/2009 ($17,400)
$140,500 $113,000 5/8/2009 ($27,500)
$549,900 $460,000 5/12/2009 ($89,900)
$210,000 $227,000 5/20/2009 $17,000
$209,900 $203,500 5/19/2009 ($6,400)
$199,900 $182,000 5/6/2009 ($17,900)
$198,000 $195,000 5/28/2009 ($3,000)
$175,900 $175,000 5/8/2009 ($900)
$151,900 $176,000 5/21/2009 $24,100
$145,000 $135,000 5/13/2009 ($10,000)
$142,500 $131,000 6/2/2009 ($11,500)
$139,900 $139,900 5/18/2009 $0
$122,900 $122,000 5/19/2009 ($900)
$122,500 $122,500 5/8/2009 $0
$599,000 $525,000 5/20/2009 ($74,000)
$599,000 $540,000 5/12/2009 ($59,000)
$180,000 $183,000 6/3/2009 $3,000
$166,500 $155,000 5/14/2009 ($11,500)
$114,900 $100,000 5/8/2009 ($14,900)
$509,900 $661,000 5/20/2009 $151,100
$338,900 $330,000 5/19/2009 ($8,900)
$323,900 $323,900 5/19/2009 $0
$308,900 $257,250 5/8/2009 ($51,650)
$185,000 $171,500 6/3/2009 ($13,500)
$175,000 $175,000 5/8/2009 $0
$144,900 $142,500 5/22/2009 ($2,400)
$142,900 $140,100 5/18/2009 ($2,800)
$127,900 $120,500 5/18/2009 ($7,400)
$122,000 $122,000 5/11/2009 $0
$499,900 $405,000 5/12/2009 ($94,900)
$445,000 $417,000 5/18/2009 ($28,000)
$498,000 $465,000 5/15/2009 ($33,000)
$259,900 $210,000 5/22/2009 ($49,900)
$249,900 $252,400 5/28/2009 $2,500
$229,900 $227,000 5/8/2009 ($2,900)
$209,900 $165,000 5/12/2009 ($44,900)
$205,900 $230,000 5/13/2009 $24,100
$169,900 $164,900 5/27/2009 ($5,000)
$169,900 $155,000 5/28/2009 ($14,900)
$169,900 $155,000 6/4/2009 ($14,900)
$169,100 $169,000 5/13/2009 ($100)
$162,900 $157,000 5/29/2009 ($5,900)
$159,900 $127,500 5/11/2009 ($32,400)
$157,900 $154,000 5/6/2009 ($3,900)
$134,900 $132,900 5/12/2009 ($2,000)
$129,900 $122,000 6/4/2009 ($7,900)
$119,900 $115,000 5/15/2009 ($4,900)
$117,100 $118,000 5/20/2009 $900
$104,900 $97,000 5/26/2009 ($7,900)
$1,500,000 $1,102,000 5/12/2009 ($398,000)
$1,179,900 $1,179,900 5/29/2009 $0
$436,900 $420,000 5/29/2009 ($16,900)
$399,750 $372,900 5/8/2009 ($26,850)
$337,900 $337,000 5/21/2009 ($900)
$290,000 $275,000 5/18/2009 ($15,000)
$276,900 $265,000 6/4/2009 ($11,900)
$200,000 $200,000 6/3/2009 $0
$195,000 $195,000 5/22/2009 $0
$190,000 $190,000 5/19/2009 $0
$175,000 $182,000 5/15/2009 $7,000
$153,900 $152,900 5/15/2009 ($1,000)
$144,900 $132,500 5/7/2009 ($12,400)
$139,555 $142,050 5/26/2009 $2,495
$128,800 $130,000 5/21/2009 $1,200
$110,000 $92,000 5/14/2009 ($18,000)
$104,100 $114,405 6/3/2009 $10,305
$620,900 $600,000 6/3/2009 ($20,900)
$190,510 $179,000 5/6/2009 ($11,510)
$268,900 $269,900 5/27/2009 $1,000
$1,295,000 $1,060,000 5/14/2009 ($235,000)
$999,900 $975,000 5/18/2009 ($24,900)
$280,000 $295,000 5/29/2009 $15,000
$799,000 $665,000 5/27/2009 ($134,000)
$777,777 $740,000 6/2/2009 ($37,777)
$675,000 $275,000 5/19/2009 ($400,000)
$640,000 $275,000 5/19/2009 ($365,000)
$605,900 $590,000 5/12/2009 ($15,900)
$536,635 $575,000 5/26/2009 $38,365
$509,900 $534,677 5/21/2009 $24,777
$499,000 $137,800 5/19/2009 ($361,200)
$424,900 $425,000 6/3/2009 $100
$399,900 $390,000 6/3/2009 ($9,900)
$364,900 $340,000 5/28/2009 ($24,900)
$267,500 $265,000 5/19/2009 ($2,500)
$204,000 $190,000 5/21/2009 ($14,000)
$185,000 $185,000 5/6/2009 $0
$178,500 $175,000 5/13/2009 ($3,500)
$134,900 $142,750 5/15/2009 $7,850
$129,000 $122,000 5/6/2009 ($7,000)
$119,900 $113,000 5/21/2009 ($6,900)
$600,000 $470,000 5/13/2009 ($130,000)
$550,000 $200,000 6/3/2009 ($350,000)
$410,000 $355,000 5/20/2009 ($55,000)
$229,000 $205,000 5/7/2009 ($24,000)
$223,900 $223,900 5/13/2009 $0
$199,900 $188,300 5/28/2009 ($11,600)
$199,000 $199,000 6/2/2009 $0
$194,900 $186,000 5/7/2009 ($8,900)
$189,900 $182,000 5/20/2009 ($7,900)
$185,000 $174,900 5/6/2009 ($10,100)
$184,900 $170,000 6/2/2009 ($14,900)
$599,900 $532,483 5/13/2009 ($67,417)
$350,000 $350,000 5/13/2009 $0
$180,000 $176,200 5/6/2009 ($3,800)
$165,000 $158,000 5/26/2009 ($7,000)
$154,900 $145,000 5/21/2009 ($9,900)
$150,000 $150,000 5/8/2009 $0
$149,900 $147,000 6/4/2009 ($2,900)
$148,900 $140,275 5/14/2009 ($8,625)
$425,000 $372,750 5/28/2009 ($52,250)
$364,900 $320,500 5/14/2009 ($44,400)
$332,900 $332,900 5/20/2009 $0
$216,900 $207,000 5/15/2009 ($9,900)
$141,900 $139,900 5/12/2009 ($2,000)
$135,500 $105,000 5/13/2009 ($30,500)
$129,000 $115,000 5/29/2009 ($14,000)
$128,900 $120,000 5/13/2009 ($8,900)
$119,900 $105,700 6/4/2009 ($14,200)
ave ave sales/list # at or above list
$279,142 $258,145 92.48% 106

2 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • June 04 2009 11:40AM

Atlanta Market Stats for April 2009

Below are the numbers for the total FMLS area for April 2009. They are for single family detached homes. 

I  have graphs for 26 local market areas around Atlanta.  Links with a reference map are down below.

Overall, the numbers were encouraging. The average price actually went up vs. the previous month of March.  I'm personally seeing multiple offers on many homes that are priced low from the beginning. 

Clayton County prices are still on the decline.  The average price now is all the way down to $44,779.  Just 12 months ago it was just over $100,000. 

The areas that seem to be holding up on prices are Alpharetta/Roswell and North East Cobb and Dunwoody.

South DeKalb still is falling along with the Stone Mountain area.

South Fulton's big fall in prices might be bottoming out.  Inside the Perimeter in South Fulton prices finally went up a little after touching $40,000.

Year over year numbers for March for single family detached homes for the total FMLS areas are as follows:

Average sales price decreased 20% from $240,473 to $191,803.

Number of transactions decreased 7.3% from 3,564 to 3,303

 

 

 

For more specific market areas, click on the links below.

Clayton County  (Area 161)

Cobb County, South (Area 72)
Cobb County, South Central (Area 73)
Cobb County, West (Area 74)
Cobb County, Northwest (Area 75)
Cobb County, Northeast (Area 81)
Cobb County, East Central (Area 82)
Cobb County, East South (Area 83)

DeKalb County, Tucker (Area 41)
DeKalb County, Stone Mountain (Area 42)
DeKalb County, South (Area 43)
DeKalb County, Decatur (Area 52)
DeKalb County, Dunwoody (Area 121)

Forsyth County, East (Area 221)
Forsyth County, West (Area 222)

Fulton County, Alpharetta/Roswell (Area 13)
Fulton County, Alpharetta (Area 14)
Fulton County, Buckhead (Area 21)
Fulton County, Bankhead Hwy. (Area 22)
Fulton County, Midtown (Area 23)
Fulton County, West End (Area 31)
Fulton County, South Fulton (Area 33)
Fulton County , Sandy Springs (Area 131)
Fulton County, Sandy Springs (Area 132)

Gwinnett County, Duluth/Buford (Area 62)
Gwinnett County , Lilburn (Area 64)

0 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • May 26 2009 10:24AM

$1800 Georgia Home Buyer Tax Credit. Effective June 1st, (I think)

Governor Sonny Purdue has a press release on his website announcing his signing of House Bill 261.

Governor Sonny Perdue today signed House Bill 261, which provides a $1,800 tax credit for home purchases. The credit, which would be taken over three years, takes effect immediately and is meant to spur activity in the housing market.

I checked out the actual Bill to make sure I understood the details.  The main detail I wanted to verify is the closing date necessary in order to get the credit.  The Governor's website said "The credit...takes effect immediately" but my reading of the Bill makes me believe it actually takes effect on June 1st.

...for the purchase of one eligible single-family residence made during the six-month period commencing on the first day of the month following the effective date of this Code section and ending on the last day of the sixth complete month thereafter.

I called the Governor's office for clarification.  I finally got Sonny Purdue's assistant.  I asked for clarification because his press release seems to differ from the actual bill.  He told me that I should talk with an attorney for their interpretation but in his layman's opinion, he thinks that it takes effect on June 1st.  I told him that in my opinion, the Governor might want to change his press release to clarify this.  Where I come from, "takes effect immediately" means just that.

The credit isn't limited to first time homebuyers like the federal tax credit is.

The credit is for up to $1800 or no more than 1.2% of the purchase price, whichever is less.

You only can take one third of it per year for the next three years.

If it does in fact take effect on June 1st, then it might be worthwhile to try to delay any closing between now and June 1st.

2 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • May 13 2009 12:39PM

Cobb County Property Tax Estimator

Many people ask me about property taxes. Usually it's around 1% of the home value.

But it depends on the homestead exemption and some other exemptions like the senior citizen break they give you in Cobb County. 

Cobb has a neat online property  tax estimator.  Just put in the value of the home and it will give you the estimated tax with and without a homestead exemption and alsof what it would be for people 62 years old and up.

Here is the result for a $400,000 home.

Estimated Taxes
(No Homestead)
$4,600.00
Estimated Taxes
(Basic Homestead)
$4,342.30
Estimated Taxes
(Homestead with Age 62 School Exemption)
$1,507.30

0 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • May 11 2009 12:19PM

Local Experience? Show Me Your Map

With every home that I help a buyer purchase, I get a little smarter. I show the typical buyer between 20-50 homes before they make their decision.  For every buyer who ends up buying, there are probably 3-5 who don't end up buying for one reason or another.  The bottom line is that over the years, I've seen a lot of homes and  slowly have acquired a lot of practical experience.

Our MLS allows you to map out search results.  I thought it would be interesting to visually see where we have helped buyers buy a home.  I did a search for sales with us as the buyer's agent and below is a map that shows the 78 homes that my partner and I have helped buyers purchase.  The FMLS results go back between 2-3 years.  I've been an agent for 10 years and my partner has been an agent for 26 years.  So you can imagine what the map would look like with the total of our sales.

We get a lot of relocation people so we need to cover a pretty large area.  For other areas of Atlanta, we refer out to the agents in our referral network that we've developed over the years.  This allows us to hook buyers up with agents who have experience in the areas that they are interested in. 

If you are shopping around for a buyer's agent, you might want to ask them to show you a map like this.  Let them show you a map of their sales that they personally were involved with. 

Sometimes a map is worth a thousand words.

(Shameless Advertisement)

HomeAtlanta.com


Search Atlanta MLS
No Registration
No Email Spam
No Agent Calls


When you are ready
See
15 Homes in 3 Hours

We make it easy

Market Stats
Charts for 26 Atlanta Areas

 


VideoAgentGuy
The Inside Scoop

Home Warranties
Preferred Lenders
Desperate Agents




Real Action
Home Video Tours



3 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • May 06 2009 01:11PM

Atlanta Market Stats

These numbers came out two weeks ago.  I've been really busy but I finally got time to update all of my charts. 

Below are the numbers for the total FMLS area for March 2009. They are for single family detached homes. It's nice to know but the important numbers are what's happening in your more immediate area.  For that, I now have graphs for 26 local market areas around Atlanta.  Links with a reference map are down below.  I'll add  about 10 more areas as time permits over the next few months.

Overall, the numbers were encouraging. I think the next two months will see the number of sales transactions go up quite a bit.  The March sales numbers are the result of buyers making offers in January and February.  I personally saw a big surge of activity in February and March so I think the sales numbers in April and May will reflect that.  

Clayton County has taken a beating in prices in the past two years so the average price is now $47,365.  That sure looks like an opportunity. Especially since their school district is now getting their accreditation back.

Sales in Sandy Springs have slowed dramatically.  I had to do a double take when I saw the number of transactions. North Sandy Springs only had 9 transactions in March and South Sandy Springs had only 5.

East Cobb, Area #83, also showed only 22 transactions for March.

Year over year numbers for March for single family detached homes for the total FMLS areas are as follows:

Average sales price decreased 25.5% from $246,901 to $183,800.

Number of transactions decreased 10.6% from 3,599 to 3,215

 

 

 

For more specific market areas, click on the links below.

Clayton County  (Area 161)

Cobb County, South (Area 72)
Cobb County, South Central (Area 73)
Cobb County, West (Area 74)
Cobb County, Northwest (Area 75)
Cobb County, Northeast (Area 81)
Cobb County, East Central (Area 82)
Cobb County, East South (Area 83)

DeKalb County, Tucker (Area 41)
DeKalb County, Stone Mountain (Area 42)
DeKalb County, South (Area 43)
DeKalb County, Decatur (Area 52)
DeKalb County, Dunwoody (Area 121)

Forsyth County, East (Area 221)
Forsyth County, West (Area 222)

Fulton County, Alpharetta/Roswell (Area 13)
Fulton County, Alpharetta (Area 14)
Fulton County, Buckhead (Area 21)
Fulton County, Bankhead Hwy. (Area 22)
Fulton County, Midtown (Area 23)
Fulton County, West End (Area 31)
Fulton County, South Fulton (Area 33)
Fulton County , Sandy Springs (Area 131)
Fulton County, Sandy Springs (Area 132)

Gwinnett County, Duluth/Buford (Area 62)
Gwinnett County , Lilburn (Area 64)

1 commentTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • May 06 2009 08:56AM

Always be Caring and the Closings Will Happen

I think that the key to getting more business is to care about your clients.  It's pretty basic stuff.  No tricks or techniques to learn.  Just be a human being who really cares about the welfare of your client. 

If you care, the closings will happen.

I studied many sales training techniques and understand their methods.  But if it's just about doing whatever it takes in order to get to the closing table so you can get your check, then I'm probably a big loser.

Many times getting to the closing table is also in the best interest of the client.  That's when it's good to know the techniques to help the process along.

But I still think that the original intent of what you do has to be caring about the client and not about closing the deal.

Last week I was helping a buyer get some response on their loan.  She was frustrated with the people in the loan process.

She told me "Tim, it just seems that no one really cares if we get this loan closed or not."  The loan guy went on vacation a week before our closing and didn't seem to have cared what happened with the loan documents while he was gone.  I guess he didn't put himself in my buyer's situation and empathize with her about what would happen if we didn't  close as planned.

So my closing technique is simple.  Put yourself in your client's shoes.  Imagine what their fears and concerns are.  Then just care enough about them to want to naturally help them through their fears to the closing table.

I like the ABC method.  Always Be Caring. 

37 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • April 13 2009 08:57AM

Whatta Mess...

I wanted to reblog this article because I've heard it too many times. "Tim, the home is brand new.  Why should I spend the money to have it inspected?"

From my experience, brand new homes end up having more problems found than a resale home.

The other big reason to find them upfront and make the builder correct them is that when you go to resell in a few years, your buyer's inspector is going to find all of the problems and then will be asking you to correct them.

 

Via Michael Thornton - Nashville, TN area Home Inspector (Complete Home Inspections, Inc.):
Okay! So we have heard the drill before. Oh, this is a new house which has been inspected by the codes department. They have issued a CO (and as we listen to the crickets chirp, birds sing and hallelujahs spring forth from the cherub sitting on the eaves) all is in a state of bliss and peace fills every nook and cranny of the property. That is until the #@%&!!! home inspector arrives.

New construction issuesSuch as with the case of a new property that I inspected just recently in the Nashville, TN area. In this picture alone are several problems. Some like the cracked window, unpainted wood on the inside and mud spatter are quite obvious. However, the more subtile issues such as the missing sleeve on the gas line penetration at the masonry surface is not. Although you can't see it in this picture, the retaining wall does not have an adequate foundation and the wall itself is undersized for the amount of dirt it is holding back.

All in all, there were over 75 construction issues found with this 6700 sq. ft. property, and we were not being "picky". We were New construction issuesjust doing our job. Most of these, Brother Ray could have seen. Almost all of these were just poor attention to detail, poor workmanship on the behalf of the tradesmen, or just poor supervision by the project superintendent. Which ever the case, for a new construction property, this place was a real mess from an inspection standpoint.

As the economy tightens, many builders seem to be cutting corners, or hiring tradesmen that marginalize the building guidelines. So just because the property is new and has been "inspected" by "codes", for peace of mind, have an independent set of eyes evaluate your new property. You will be amazed at how many issues a good qualified home inspector will find.


Wishing all my fellow drips and tweeps a G-r-r-r-reat day... 8-)
If you or someone you know is purchasing a home in Brentwood, Franklin, Nashville, Spring Hill or Thompson's Station in the Davidson or Williamson county area of Middle Tennessee and would like more information about getting a home inspection, give us a call at 615.661.0297. You can visit us online at www.completehomeinspectionsonline.com - Check out our monthly newletter
Your building consultants for life...

Follow me on Twitter...

By TwitterButtons.com
You can follow me on FaceBook too...

© 2009 michael thornton | complete home inspections, inc. | brentwood, tn | 615.661.0297 | www.completehomeinspectionsonline.com

Large enough for excellent service... Small enough to care...
1 commentTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • March 17 2009 06:40AM

The Ultimate Virtual Tour. I Can't Wait.

Check out the latest in virtual reality. Click the link to see the cool headset.

Now a team of British academics from York and Warwick universities have launched a project to create the first authentic VR helmet - a device that stimulates the senses so convincingly they have called in Real Virtuality.

The Virtual Cocoon will consist of a headset packed with specially developed electronics - including a high definition, high dynamic computer screen, state of the art speakers, fans to blow hot and cold air over the wearer's face and a 'smell tube' which releases chemicals under the nose to mimic real life odours.

Prof Alan Chalmers of Warwick said the headset should be complete in three to five years. He believes it will be

I want to be the first real estate agent who uses one of these things.  Can you imagine the possibilities?

It sounds like you can transmit what you are experiencing in 3D to someone anywhere in the world who also has one of these devices.

Imagine what that means to buyers.  Their buyer agent can go from house to house while the buyer is watching in 3D from the comfort of their rocker recliner. 

I already have the website, www.VirtualBuyersAgent.combut after seeing this, my video technology seems so primitive.

3 commentsTim Maitski "Video Agent Guy" • March 04 2009 02:12PM